Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Press. TUESDAY, JANUARY 20, 1903. THE ELINGAMITE ENQUIRY.

The first though! vrlwh will strike tbe ■ ■ ■ ■ j .. public on reading the result of the Elingamito enquiry is that the sentence of tihe Court is very inadequate when compared with the gravity of the charges which they found to bo proved. They found Captain Attwood guilty of "grossly negligent navi- " gation" in driving at full speed through a fog, and in not taking soundings, and they also found him, guilty of a "grave error of "judgment" in allowing No. 1 boat to leave the ship, and particularly to leave it with only half the complement *be was able to carry. Ytt, they deemed it sufficient punishment for tihtse offences to suspend hie certificate for a year and to order him to pay £60 towards the costs of the enquiry. It is true that such a sentence carries with, it professional degradation, and that the subject of it will probably find it difficult to get another command when the jieriod for -which his certificate has been suspended has expired. Nevertheless, it cannot be forgotten that the "gross negligence' , of which the captain has been found guilty led to the loss of a steamer and of seven*: valuable live*. Had he been in charge of a horse and trap which had ran over a child with fatal results, and had a coroner's jury returned a verdict that lie had been gniity of "gross negligence,- lie would have bsen committed, for trial for manslaughter. We certaMy think that Captain Attwood may cowider himself very lightly dealt with. The same thing may be ssid o£tb» officers, who get tbsir cntiSeatw

retttrnedVaiUwugb the Court is of epiwoa that "their conduct was not ceasmmdaKe, "either in taundEng the boat* at E* taae "of the wreck, or in k*** ,l ? p»s««>«e ra M adrift on the raft" If 'tint <*J«* of these inquiries is to compel captains and officers t» exercise more care in the discharge of tbeir siuUe, the Qoxai mm* be prepared to inflict penaltiee proportioned to the gravity of the offences proved. This, we think, they have failed in this inetance to do.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19030120.2.21

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Press, Volume LX, Issue 11486, 20 January 1903, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
358

The Press. TUESDAY, JANUARY 20, 1903. THE ELINGAMITE ENQUIRY. Press, Volume LX, Issue 11486, 20 January 1903, Page 4

The Press. TUESDAY, JANUARY 20, 1903. THE ELINGAMITE ENQUIRY. Press, Volume LX, Issue 11486, 20 January 1903, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert