READERS CONSIDER
THE HARBOUR AGAIN Sir, —Mr C. R. J. Relf, Manawahe, in his letter re harbour location, makes comparison of the respective debts, Tauranga £21,000 as against Whakatane £63,666. He does not balance his comparison by giving the annual tonnage of the two ports, nor does he work out the debt per ton. We also know that the Tauranga port has up to the present had little work whereas V/hakatane’s present port is the result of expensive rock demolition, etc. while increasing her shipping.
Because a farm or a business carries a mortage, it does not necessarily indicate that it is not a busi-' ness-like and paying proposition, rather the reverse is often indicated, that the concern is undertaking development and expansion. Without any timber to boost the tonnage, Whakatane has already proved its claim to be the produce port for the Bay. Present debt has little to do with the question under consideration. Yours etc., MERE HOUSEWIFE. Whakatane, September 24.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BPB19500927.2.16
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 16, Issue 1, 27 September 1950, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
162READERS CONSIDER Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 16, Issue 1, 27 September 1950, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Beacon Printing and Publishing Company is the copyright owner for the Bay of Plenty Beacon. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Beacon Printing and Publishing Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in