CENTRALISED CONTROL AND PARTY POLITICS

Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 13, Issue 64, 14 March 1949, Page 4

CENTRALISED CONTROL AND PARTY POLITICS

Sir,—lt has been said: The situation calls for closer understanding between the British Commonwealth and the U.S.A.! Now, as it stands, there is close understanding between Wall Street and the Bank of England (and, as Rothschild said, “Give me the control of a nation’s finance, and I don’t care who rules”). So it may be truly said that so long as we, the British people, are governed by a newlyfound'nation (Israel) based on dollar control, forcing the issue under the guise of that stool pigeon “Party Politics” (divide and rule), when either party wins, the people lose.

Our heavyweight politicians must have brushed up the education when travelling around the States under the patronage of High Finance! But General Eisenhower has issued a warning (New York, February 13, 1949) that the United States is in danger of falling ipto the hands of a dictatorship without a shot being fired.,

He says the gradual drift of bureaucracy (party politics) will result in centralised control. He might have added his warning to the British nation as well. We are having it.

Therefore we must not surrender our freedom of thought over our lives; and the right to exercise our vote to dictate the policy of the administration. Not an “open cheque” to either party, but a “demand vote” to carry out the will of the people. A referendum on those things that count is required, such as the Havana Pact and the £8 a week retiring allowance. Yours etc.,

W. BRADSHAW.