Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CONTROL OF WILD LIFE

FISHING AND SHOOTING

PRESENT SYSTEM CRITICISED

In a revieAV of control of wild life Mr G. Stokell, president of the Canterbury Branch of the Royal Society of New Zealand, indicates kinks in control by acclimatisation societies.

"When we come to examine the constitution and proceedings of acclimatisation societies," he states, "we find that these bodies are composed of the purchasers of licenses to kill either lish or game, that these composite groups of killers elect councils to receive the killing fees and manage affairs generally and that these councils appoint from their own personnel a centra 1 , association to provide contact with the Government and deal with matters of more than common delicacy.

"One wonders, in passing, why the controlling bodies should be of a -composite character, instead of the control of fish and that of game being separately administered. Apart from the gratification of the killing instinct, the act of killing fish lias little in common with the iict of killing game, and an author' ity in either department of sport is not necessarily an authority in t'he other. "But the most surprising circumstance is that the killers should have control of the animals they kill, that the sole qualification for safeguarding the welfare of wild creatures should be the possession of n desire to kill them asi manifested bjr the purchase of a killing permit. One seeks in vain for a parallel m any other social sphere.

"If this principle is a sound one the control of the mineral resources of this country ought to be in the hands of the mining interests that exploit them ; the conservation of forests should be left to the sawmillers; and it would require? little extension of it to justify the control. of wealth being placcd in the hands of the indolent ami improvident. Such arrangements would ap-

proximate the present system of control of sporting animals, where the care of the prey is committed t'> the tender mercies of the predators. "Whatever protective influence the license fee may exercise in its direct application i.v far outweighed by the destructive effect of its reactions. Open seasons for the taking of game are granted by the Government on the recommendation of acclimatisation societies, without, reference to any disinterested authority or scientific body."

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BPB19410827.2.4

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 4, Issue 147, 27 August 1941, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
383

CONTROL OF WILD LIFE Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 4, Issue 147, 27 August 1941, Page 2

CONTROL OF WILD LIFE Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 4, Issue 147, 27 August 1941, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert