Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CORRECTION!

CONTRIBUTORS ALLEGATION! SEWAGE LOAN QUESTION ' I " In a recent letter appearing in our correspondence columns s " over the uom-de-plume 'Stay Put* the statement was made! "Surely this is not the same Mr -* Canning who some time, ago, fought tooth and nail against a proposed sewerage scheme for Whakatane because it would increase his rates." We understand ?. that the writer had no founda- ; tion whatsoever tor making such a declaration and as we had no knowledge of the subject which occurred some time | before the BEACON commenced! publication we .regret its inference, make retraction, and hasten to apologiise foi any injury Mr Canning may have felt.

(The true position of the proced->-ure of the sewerage loan has been! made known to us by the Town. Clerk, Mr D. V. Saunders. A special' rating area, which included the business section and that portion of the residential area known as 'Apanui' was investigated with the idea of installing a modern seweragesystem. The engineer's estimate atthe time was £16 } "500. A poll wast taken and the scheme was carrifed by 29 votes >o 5. The public interest in the project could not have been great in vieAv of the fact that the Borough Roll indicated no less than 239 ratepayer? eligible to vote. Tenders were promptly called fill® from them it was learnt that the scheme Avas likely to cost between £23,000 and £25,000. This was considered quite beyond the resources of the Borough at the time and as a result, the Health Board which had instigated the move in the first instance agreed to temporarily shelve it until a more favourable opportunity presented itself. The council in voting for the first pro-, posal was unanimous. Ed,)

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BPB19410331.2.32

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 3, Issue 289, 31 March 1941, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
284

CORRECTION! Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 3, Issue 289, 31 March 1941, Page 5

CORRECTION! Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 3, Issue 289, 31 March 1941, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert