Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

N.Z. BUILDINGS

INTERESTING REMINDERS

SOME UGLY LEGACIES In a centennial survey of buildings in New Zealand Mr Paul Pascoe gives a reminder of some ug 1 y legacies. The Victorian tradition of the 1840 settlers was expressed in their first public buildings, iie writes. But the tradition itself lacked unity, since it combined those opposites, tho Gothic of the romantic revival led by Pugiri and Ruskin, and the plainer classical style which had contributed .so much to ISth century and Rcgcncy England. Gothic copied the pointed arch of the medieval church and cloister. The classical . style, revived at the time of the Renaissance, was derived through Rome from the massive, manypillared temples of the ancient Greeks. It was full of weight and dignity, and relied on the justness, of proportions for its effect. Later in the Victorian period the formless drift of the architecture of the day in England was all top faithfully reflected in Now Zealand buildings. A few New Zealand archi teets, influenced by the enlightened ideas of William Morris and his group, produced buildings that compared well with their models. But the individualism that allows every building in a street to have its own dissenting style was even more acute in New Zealand than overseas. This gave to our towns the amazing contrasts of dignity and ostentation, of style and trash, of restraint and ornament, which mar tiie individual achievement of a single good buildinu. It is this confusion of standards which makes New Zealand even more than contemporary England, aesthetically un sat is f y Ing, asp cci ally as there is the added contrast of buildings in variously painted wood and in stone, brick and concreteBut to-day New Zealanders are aware of new standards in arehitecture and they are shedding their dislike to put up buildings which arc clearly functional. But biii! flings are so permanent that it Avill be many years before tho streets of the larger towns achieve any real unity.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/BPB19401211.2.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 2, Issue 248, 11 December 1940, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
328

N.Z. BUILDINGS Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 2, Issue 248, 11 December 1940, Page 3

N.Z. BUILDINGS Bay of Plenty Beacon, Volume 2, Issue 248, 11 December 1940, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert