Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WORKER'S CLAIM.

SEQUEL TO BLAST. A COMPLICATED DISABILITY. A claim against the State Advances Corporation (Mr. Goldstine) for compensation was made in the Compensation Court before Mr. Justice O'Regan to-day by Ivan Jurich, stone wall builder, of Mount Eden (Mr. J. J. Sullivan). Mr. Sullivan said that claimant was working at Ellerslie for the State Housing Department when he was struck on the back by a piece of stone from a blast on the road, receiving injuries to the shoulder, ribs and back. He was some time in hospital and it was found yiat one of his kidneys was ruptured and had to be removed. The operation disclosed that the kidney in question was seriously diseased and "that such operation would have been urgent had there been no accident. Compensation was paid from the date of the accident, April 24, 103S>, to October 27 last. Ever since the accident claimant had been disabled from doing stone wall work. It was claimed that 50 per cent disablement would be j>ermanent and that the disability resulted from the effects of the accident, not from any o]>eratioii or disease of the kidney. Consequently Jurich claimed a permanent weekly compensation or a lump sum. The dispute would rest mostly on medical evidence as to the question of disability. Claimant gave evidence on the lines indicated. He said he was now 47 years of a.ge and had been 30 years in New Zealand. Evidence was given by Dr. J. R. Connolly that claimant at the moment was fitted for light work only and would probably have not been fit for that until a year after the accident. Witness expressed an opinion that claimant's present disability w-as due to some extent to the accident and not to the diseased kidney. Dr. D. RobU agreed that some of claimant's present disability arose from effects of the accident. The defence, said Mr. Goldstine, was that six months was ample time to allow for incapacity as a result of the accident and that any further disability was due to the kidney disease from which claimant was found to be suffering at the time of the accident. Dr. F. Macky and Dr. T. W. J. Johnstone gave evidence on the lines indicated by counsel and his Honor reserved his decision.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19400924.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Auckland Star, Volume LXXI, Issue 227, 24 September 1940, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
380

WORKER'S CLAIM. Auckland Star, Volume LXXI, Issue 227, 24 September 1940, Page 3

WORKER'S CLAIM. Auckland Star, Volume LXXI, Issue 227, 24 September 1940, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert