Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LETTERS "NOT RECEIVED."

. Two interesting items appear in the report, of the last meeting of the Waitemata Count? Council The iirst is a decision that two letteis be not received," one of whiM. anT a i? roW J? rate P a 3 rer with a grieJ" ance. Now there is nothing unusual V. ratepayer of the Waitemata County Council havmg a grievance; in fact the only S payers that I can imagine being without ™ would be those resident in Te Atatu. From the published reports of the letters in questS +i I+l S6e . er . e 13 in ei ther of them that the respective riding members can take exception to. There is usually keen competU tion for membership of local bodies. Thorn is no compulsion. Some plead almost with tears m their eyes (a local phrase) for the job, yet after election they lose sight of tfca fact that after all they J ml y Sr^ ?hJ\°h 6 - W i + m • . ey asked to "Present and that their duty as to serve the ratepayers and that the maintenance of their own imaginary dignityis not the sole or first duty of°office Mr. O Halloran is reported as saying "he would' be prepared to give a full explanation of the matters raised, but under the circumstances he was not prepared to do this." Somewhat confused phraseology and not the correct attitude for a public representative to adopt If any member of the council feels that he is unable to give the ratepayers whom he renresents proper service he has the privilege of resigning The second item of interest is that at this self-same meeting the members of the | council took umbrage at some action on the 'part of the member for Auckland Suburbs, Apparently tliey considered ■ that their dignity or importance had. not received proper recogni« tion at the hands of the member for the district and decided to send him a letter on the subject. Not a "Your-subj'ects-humbly-plead" sort \l etter > kuk " a strong letter of protest to Mr. Mason objecting to his action in not first consulting the council." How dare he! I wonder if Mr. Mason will copy the example set linn by the council and mark "the strongly worded protest" "not received." Some local bodies have no sense of humour. GLEN EDEUi

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19290926.2.35

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Auckland Star, Volume LX, Issue 228, 26 September 1929, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
384

LETTERS "NOT RECEIVED." Auckland Star, Volume LX, Issue 228, 26 September 1929, Page 6

LETTERS "NOT RECEIVED." Auckland Star, Volume LX, Issue 228, 26 September 1929, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert