Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OFFER REJECTED.

WAIPORI POWER STATION. CITY WILL RETAIN IT. DEPARTMENT'S CHARGES TOO HIGH. (By Telegraph.—Own Correspondent.) DUNEDIN, Wednesday. The Dunedin City Council will not sell its hydro-electric works at Waipori to the Government. Instead, it will proceed at once with its own programme for the development of the station. The Government offered to pay the council £531,845, plus the capital expenditure by the council this year on the headwo'rks. .It stipulated that the council should buy power from the Department in bulk, at £4 16/ a kilowatt, delivered, this price to be.payable in respect to only the first 32,000 kilowatts of maximum demand.' The Electricity Committee of the council reported that the price nailied •was higher than it was costing the council to generate power at present, and higher, too, than the council might reasonably expect. to generate it on, future should the maximum demand on the -station .increase -at anything approaching the , engineer's estimates. In view of this fact the committeerecommended that- the negotiations be abandoned,- with a view to proceeding: forthwith with the development of the station on lines necessary to ensure the maxirimm economic capacity of the river,, namely, 32,000 kilowatts. The council unanimously adopted the report.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19290926.2.189

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Auckland Star, Volume LX, Issue 228, 26 September 1929, Page 16

Word count
Tapeke kupu
200

OFFER REJECTED. Auckland Star, Volume LX, Issue 228, 26 September 1929, Page 16

OFFER REJECTED. Auckland Star, Volume LX, Issue 228, 26 September 1929, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert