Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNIVERSITY CONTROL.

As in duty bound, the Minister of Education attempted yesterday to make out a case for the New Zealand University Amending Bill. But as regards the principal points at issue we cannot congratulate M,r. Wright upon his success. The main features of the Bill to which the Professorial Boards here and in other centres have taken exception are the subordination of the University Council to the Education Department in regard to the establishment of new chair 3, and the substitution of an annual appropriation for the present statutory grant. Regarding the second point, the Minister told Parliament that the University "is in a strong financial position," as it has built up a reserve of £45,000. But Mr. Wright omitted to add that the interest on this sum is used as a fund to provide University scholarships and to enable our most promising graduates to proceed with their studies in Britain or elsewhere abroad. If Mr. Wright reduces the annual grant for University purposes on this plea he will be virtually cutting down the necessary expenditure on scholarships, and such a policy would react most injuriously on our academic system. As for the other point to which we have referred, Mr. Wright pleads that he is constantly beset with applications for more expenditure on University purposes, and therefore the Department ought to have the power to decide whether new chairs shall or shall not be established. The Minister seems here to be confusing two distinct questions. The Government certainly must decide for itself what amount of money it can afford to spend on the University. But the University Council alone should be competent to decide on what- lines of development our academic system shall evolve. This is a matter for expert academic judgment, on which the opinion of Departmental officials is quite valueless, and we hope that Mr. Wright will see the necessity for drawing this distinction immediately.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19281002.2.33

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Auckland Star, Volume LIX, Issue 233, 2 October 1928, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
319

UNIVERSITY CONTROL. Auckland Star, Volume LIX, Issue 233, 2 October 1928, Page 6

UNIVERSITY CONTROL. Auckland Star, Volume LIX, Issue 233, 2 October 1928, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert