Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SOMETHING ACHIEVED.

In the history of Parliaments there has been many a dreary all-night sitting to less purpose than that produced in Wellington by the Mental Defectives Bill. The ''Herald' , scolds everybody concerned in the opposition, inside and outside Parliament, for responsibility in an unseemly exhibition. Certainly all-night sittings are not particularly edifying, but to suggest that there was party feeling or anything petty behind this is absurd and insulting. The "Herald" ignores quite a number of facts. First, the Minister distinctly promised that the Bill should be considered on non-party lines. Yet when the Government makes it a party measure, its critics are censured for their opposition! Then there is the fact that the opposition to the Bill inside and outside the House is based upon vitally important principles, and is well informed. Are the views of professors, which have just been reinforced by expert opinion in the Old World, to be swept aside as the product of ignorance or party feeling? Can it be seriously suggested that when Mr. Peter Fraser spent hours putting together material for a series of excellent articles in the ''Evening Post" he was actuated purely by a desire to injure Mr. Coates? The "Herald' , also ignores the fact that the Reform Party itself is divided on the subject; that the other day one of the leading Reform newspapers roundly condemned the Bill. Moreover, in

Tuesday night's debate more than one Reform member criticised the wording "of vital definitions in the Bill. Lastly, was not the Minister himself, by refusing to say what he Would concede, partly responsible for the length of the sitting? The Bill emerged from Committee less dangerous than when it went in, and the public cannot be blamed if it attributes this gain to the persistence of the opposition rather than to the reasonableness of the

Minister,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19280927.2.24

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Auckland Star, Volume LIX, Issue 229, 27 September 1928, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
307

SOMETHING ACHIEVED. Auckland Star, Volume LIX, Issue 229, 27 September 1928, Page 6

SOMETHING ACHIEVED. Auckland Star, Volume LIX, Issue 229, 27 September 1928, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert