S.M. COURT.

Auckland Star, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 194, 15 August 1907, Page 2

S.M. COURT.

THIS DAT. At the SJtL Conrt to-day, before Mr C. C. Kettle, S.TVT,. judgment for plaintiff was given in the following undefended cases: — W. Moo Men v. J. H. Boreham (Mercer), £1; Carpenters' TJzdon v. Albert Widdison, £4 TZ/S- r S. Holden Howie and Co- v. Alfred H. Olney, £1 10/; D.S.C., Ltd. v. T. Goalton (Kaeo) £4 IS/6; 'same v." J. Henry (Mangonni), £A 10/; Bycroft, Ltd. v. E. Nicholson, £5 9/3; E. C. Neil v. Thomas Thompson. £7 0/11; E. E. Leaninc: v. Patrick McMaion (Hamilton), £1 11/6; Wingate and Co., Ltd. v. Alfred Michelly. .£B3 0/9; G. Eichardson and Co. v. Emily C. Cooper, £10 7/H. and costs, £1 10/6; J. Pearse Baker T. R. Nicholson, £6 17/3, and costs' £1 10/6; Auckland Pure MPk Supply, Ltd. v. Thomas Bntler, £1 12/6, and costs-7/; "WlnEtone, Ltd. v. Ambrose Ruffe Tyler, £1 4J and costs 5/; H. C. Flyger and Co. v. J. Hall, £3 5/9. and costs 11/; Hipkins and Contts v. A. Michelly, £12 11/, and cost 3 £1 10/6: Arch. Clark and Sons. Ltd. v. J. Paterson (Pnkeiobe), £7 7/. and costs 23/B; B. J. OToole V. Thomas Lawson, £2 S/7, and costs 10/; John Court, Lt. v. W. Auckram (Otahuhn), £2 16/10. and costs 10/.

Claim for Calls.—The Taupiri South Coal Co., Ltd. (Mr Moore), sued F. H. Mendoza Oir Northcroft) for £25 for calls on shares In tie company. Mr Northcroft, for the defendant, urged the defence that his client ■was on the list of shareholders through fraud. After argument, the mflgietrflte aecliied that it was not a question which could influence the Court. The defendant's proper course was to apply to the Supreme Cotrrt to be removed from the list of shareholders. TJnddr the circumstances he would give Judgment for the plaintiff.