COMPETION IN MARKET GARDENING.
(To the Editor.) Sir.—ln your issue of Wednesday there I appeared an article on the nbove. Now. i sir. ;i.s I am Ihe person to whom the j : article refers, 1 feel that I am bound to ! I reply, and give the true facts of the case. : • : I strongly object to ventilate neighbourly \ i grievances through the pres*. but in thi's i ■ lease 1 mu-t. The facts are these: For' I ■ over five years and up to last December. I I T had one man employed, and the man . miirht have been there yet as far as I am j concerned. The man left upon his own 1 a< cord, and went into the employ of Mr. j [Knight. People may draw what conclu1 -ion they may from this action. In the ! .; event or the sr.nie owurrinj; agiiin. and | i ! knowing the strong objections thai Mr. I ; J Knijrht has to Chinamen. 1 thought that ' ■ f would not be troubled again i:i having < ■ .to find a man. 1 quite agree with some r ; of Mr. Knight's remarks, but there are' '; exceptions, to all rul«-s. and in my par-1 • ucular case the Chinaman that I employ , is most cleanly. In conclusion. I may ! add that I pay exactly the sajnc wage ns Mr. Knight does. Sunday work 1 ■ ; strongly object to. and do not allow upon i I my place any more than i- necessary and ' ; usually done. I respect the Sabbath! \ equally at well as most of my neighbours. ! - i .Thanking you in anticipation.—l am. i I I etc.. B FRANSHAM. • j Avondale. J THE TAIHAPE DRINK TRAGEDY. • I ' j (To the Editor.l ; j >ir.—Permit mc to briefly comment ou ' j i the latest New Zealand drink tragedy, i ; as reported in your columns from Tai- ! ( ! hape. There ha.ye been very many simi- | ' liar episodes of late, with numerous other j i indications of tile shocking results of j "the trade." They have be n so numer- i ous indeed (hat we have discontinued re- ' ' j porting them in ""The Prohibitionist" ex- ! '■ cept in the form of a summarised refer- " j ence to their frequency. To many thousands of the most thoughtful people in New Zealand it i≤ a matter of amaze-1 : rr.ent that kindly, to say nothing of Christian, people should continue to vote j for a traffic so deadly. ' i We do not deny that alcohol is "a good ' ! creature of God." It is immensely usefu! | ; to the. manufacturer and for many other 1 j purposes. We do deny that this narcotic ; ■ poison, this nerve paralyser, this cul- | league of opium, morphia, cocaine, etber, I chloroform, etc... is ntted for internal j consumption by human beings, except, ■ j possibly, and of this I am dubious,, under ' I certain conditions of ill-health. It- sal- -, I as a beverage, pays the British Registrar I I of Deaths, involves the shortciiin.s , of the i lives of those who sell it behind bars by : : over forty (40) per cent. Ought any • .humane man to ask that the lives of his f fellow men shall be thus shortened for • his convenience? Its consumption as a i beverage by those who drink moderate! v 1 ! enough to secure acceptance by lif a as- i i j surance societies, shortens their lives by !,one-third, as shown recently in the Brit- - isu •■Medical Journal's" examination into >|the statistics that dealt with 000,006 ' years of lif?. Ought humane men to sup- • i port a custom >o disastrous.. It will : claim within thirty years at least 30,009 ■ ! of the young people in this colony to ■ ,; fill the ranks of those who tell the story I of ali-ohol's power in the police courts i and asylums, the mendicants' homes, ajid I 1 the fatality columns of the newspapers. • Ml think, sir. that very nearly a thousand ! casrs of the suffering and degradation 1 and sorrow that drink brings i E to the ' ! homes of the people of New Zealand have ' ; come under my personal knowledge dur- ' ] ing the last twenty years, and I wonder. [ j increasingly, nut that so many of my col- J j leagues break with impatience against Jthe barrier that keeps them from sweep- , i :r>sr with cleansing power over the socinl i life of this colony, but that Christian men , .land women, and alas. Christian minis- , ; . ters. should be found sayincr one word in j ; j defence of the sale of alcoholic liquors.— j ; I am, etc.. > FRANK W. ISTTT, , Secretary New Zealand Alliance. i
KEEL YACHTS V. PATIKIS. (To tha Editors Sir.—ln replying to ""Keel" in your paper of the 14th inst.. I do not think he is aware that the winner (Rose) of the so-cailed farce on Anniversary Day is a keel boat, and not a patiki, and has not got a centreboard, and she is eligible to race "with the keel boats mentioned in his lette.r. I agree with him that patikis should be a separate class. —I am, etc., AT,F. DEACON.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19050222.2.101
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Auckland Star, Volume XXXVI, Issue 45, 22 February 1905, Page 10
Word count
Tapeke kupu
834COMPETION IN MARKET GARDENING. Auckland Star, Volume XXXVI, Issue 45, 22 February 1905, Page 10
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Auckland Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.