S.M. COURT.

Auckland Star, Volume XXXVI, Issue 40, 16 February 1905, Page 5

S.M. COURT.

(Before Mr McCarthy, S.il.) Undefended Cases.—His Worship M.i-rv.d judgment for plaintiff In the defendant a default in the following" cases: —C. V. W. Waraefce v. Elisabeth Stindall, £32 V. cost* £2 14/; William Monaghan v. Henry W. Smith, £27, costs £a 14/; Carder Bros, and Co;, v. J. Deverill, £3 14/3, coats £1 13,6; The Puru Consolidated G.il. i C.I Ltd., v. James Caddy Davles, £5 10/S r costs, £1 3/6; Gilmore and Co. v. Ruffell, £0 11,4, costs £19/6; Brace, Windle. Blyth and Co.. v. F. H. Vile r £S4 15/7, cost* £2 14/; h, Austin and Sous v. Wm. Tozer, £12 IU/S; costs £1 10/G; David i'eed v. H. J. Thomas. £1 16/, costs 5/; Auckland Butchers' Union v. Thomas Scott, 18/, coat* 5/; Loan and Mercantile Co. v, James Reldy, 15/, costs 5/: g. Clayton v; H. "Wilson, 12/11, co3t» 5/. - '■'." - '■ ■■

Interpreter's Fee.—Matthew Cvitanavleh sued Mstriuo Vodanovich foe £10, for services rendered In negotiating for the purchase of a sumfield. Mr Mahony defended. f£" i l ™ l hearing; plaintiff's statement. His WpPiWp said he was convinced, that the claim was a make-up one in order to get even with the defendant, who had obtained Judgment against the plaintiff last week, Claim dismiwd, with costs ajainst the alaftitlS.