Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE MERCER MYSTERY.

GRAND JURY THROWS OUT THE BILL. q f AKOTHEB LEGAL POINT t RAISED- \ 1 The grand jury this morning return- , d a "No bill" in the charge against William Murton. a dai-utter, of mar- 1 ering an old woman at Mercer. , 1 When the foreman of the jury (Mr '•■ Kent) announced their decision to!" he Judge in the main Court, the Crown "Toseeutor (the Hon. J. A. Tole) asked .'hether this decision covered also a ossible charge of manslaughter, as it |' rouid be his duty to Iky an indict- 1 lent for manslaughter. The foreman of the jury replied that he jury had come to the conclusion 1' hat there was nothing whatever to | onneet the prisoner with the violence | vhich was believed to have caused the j voinan's death. Judge Edwards said the decision evilently covered any charge of manlaughter also. The Crown Prosecutor said he had j >een informed that the grand jury had ome to their conclusion without havm_ examined all the witnesses. He I understood seven or eight witnesses lad not been examined by the grand I ury. and if this were the case it was lis duty to point out that they could i lot throw out a bill without examining | ill the witnesses named on the back j >f the indictment. The grand jury ! ruuld find a true bill without examin- j ng all the witnesses, but they could j lot throw out a bill without examin- j n_r every one of them. The foreman of the grand jury replied that he had made careful inquiry | in this point and ascertained that ) there was no legal liability on the i rrand jury compelling them to exam- I irie all the witnesses before dealing j with a bill. His Honor said he would reserve his leoision on the question which had been raised. THE CASE SENT BACK. This afternoon when the Court re-.s-ernbied alter luncheon His Honor sent for the Grand Jury, and requested rhem to reconsider their decision, it vas the English rule, he said, that the Irand Jury should examine all the wittesses before throwing out a bill. If :hey did not do this it was calculated ;o throw doubt upon the administration of justice. Mr Kent i foreman* said they would ac very pleased to act on His Honors lirection. and the jury then again reared.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19050207.2.76

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Auckland Star, Volume XXXVI, Issue 32, 7 February 1905, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
397

THE MERCER MYSTERY. Auckland Star, Volume XXXVI, Issue 32, 7 February 1905, Page 5

THE MERCER MYSTERY. Auckland Star, Volume XXXVI, Issue 32, 7 February 1905, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert