LATEST SOUTHERN TELEGRAMS.

Auckland Star, Volume VI, Issue 1670, 25 June 1875, Page 3

LATEST SOUTHERN TELEGRAMS.

owners in succession be, char«ed u Pon the summary way CCesSlon > a*d recoverable in a Row Among the Doctors* attltioT. dICa_/Sl T i 8 n°W Star that _f Jraake well has written to^the Medic-llefet;^^ «f the proposed one should St^V? Poßed _that "N° Association incotn^att^T^ 8 6f the headed by MeTrs B_L Fo«rsWous, characterised thp!f^ m! and H°<*e n> Drßakewel 1 a*_ 2as a fa^hood judgment till hi ~P I\W IC to su Pend anotherV_ to nitT" evidence ,> and profession to shew th If"? 8 UFglDg the gentlemen +lT\} emse} yes at le *st profession' in Du_ed?nf° °V he _Mdi« l -n afford to lo^te " "°* aS ** !

In th* pSllar?,e of Bigamy. MrTqS ■»" C° Urfc yesterday morning S?_r_33*w£ wCi: _- ???tiLe ______ "_ e hM tzf w" •„ v» trial. Was committed for

The Visit of Australian Cricketers.

At the cricketers' meeting Mr Mears reported that the sub-committee had confromV- ? 6 -Pr °ba„ le °? 8t 0f htin^S a team Horn Victoria, and arrived at this estimate • -Passages for twelve men to Dunedin' J i * So eQ dayS Stay in D™edin at 10s eacn, £42 • passages to Christchurch, £3G seven days' stay there, £42; passages to Wellington, £24, five days' stayf £30 ■ pas sages to Nelson, £24, five days' stay, £30 • passages to Auckland, £36, seven days' stay' £42; passages to Sydney, £120; and passages of the Victorian six from Sydney to Melbourne, £27. To this total the committee thought it politic to add for contingencies and expenses, £165. It was first proposed that the provinces should contribute £700 in equal shares, but the meeting carried a counter proposition that on behalf of the Otago cricketers it guaranteed £175 as the province's contribution, on the assumption that no more than £750 bo requited. It appeared to be the unanimous opinion of the meeting that £750 would be amply sufficient. A motion was made, that in the representative Match — Victoria v. New Zealandfifteen players representing various provinces should meet tbe visiting team at a place hereafter to be determined, and while opinions were expressed as to the number who should represent the colony, it was the unanimous feeling that it was advisable not to carry any resolution that might tend to hamper the action of other provinces. The Star published an apology in the case of McCassey v. Bell, admitting its article to be untrae and unfounded. It withdraws all imputations therein contained.