SUPREME COURT.
THIS DAY.
Before his Honor Sir G. A. Arney, and a
Special Jury, GOW AND ANOTHEE V FEASER
It appeared that the grounds of action, were, that defendant had sold to plaintiff, certain property at the Thames, the title to which had been subsequently found defective. The property had afterwaads become of much greater ralue, and had been compulsorily given up. The action was therefore brought to recover the purchase money, as well as the compensation for increased value, which it was alleged had accrued by the industry of plaintiffs? Evidence was still being taken as we went to press.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18720123.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Auckland Star, Volume III, Issue 634, 23 January 1872, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
102SUPREME COURT. Auckland Star, Volume III, Issue 634, 23 January 1872, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.
Log in