MOHI V. ORAIG.
To the Editor of the Herald.
Sir, —I am very glad to see the leading article about Mohi v. Craig, as the latter has suffered great injustice. Craig's transactions about timber commenced when I was Resident Magistrate at Coromandel in 1860-62 ; and as both parties came to me for advice, &c, I knew all about it, and saw that fair dealing obtained on both sides. Afterwards, as a land agent, the balance of money due was paid through me, after a full oral and written explanation of the whole of the transactions from beginning to end. Hiria (mother of Mohi), and Paora Matutaere, and others, were the parties concerned, as owners of the timber—Mohi being only a little boy.—t am, &c, H. li. Tuktoit.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18711030.2.28.8.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Auckland Star, Volume II, Issue 563, 30 October 1871, Page 1 (Supplement)
Word count
Tapeke kupu
127MOHI V. ORAIG. Auckland Star, Volume II, Issue 563, 30 October 1871, Page 1 (Supplement)
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
Ngā mihi
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.
Log in