Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MR. CREIGHTON'S MOTION.

GREAT GOVERNMENT VICTORY. WELLINGTON. / . I September 21. Six hundred persons attended' the- Governor's Ball last night. John Hartly has been killed by a landslip at Mungaroa. The Advertiser urges the opening of the Court-house at Wanganui. Out of twent3' cases before the Bankruptcy Court yesterday, cleTeu were from Wanganui. ' September 23. Sir. Crcighton move;! in the House that the Estimates ■bo ,rotencd back for a reduction .of £50,000. The Government made it a Ministerial question. 'J ho debate lasted several hours. Mr. Gillies concluded his speech by protesting against tlio question being made Minis! erial,-,as for .party purposes were drifento vote'against their Mr. Stewart thought it wrong to make theV&sj4<sV a" ;par^ one.; :;JBE^ Jfaadj rfull coufldehee Tin'«itWe:' ilinistry,'sbufc taking 'the motion for what it; was worth, he would support it. Ho suggested reductions in the. Legislative; 'saiyLnes,'.geoldgicitl.;^^,survey department, judicial salaries, and the abolition of the grant to: the JNew- Zealand University. ■ ""Hb—saw no provision to meet the probable revenue deficiency^-or the Supplementary' Estimates. ■'• :He> believed the next session would probably find a deficit of £60,000 or £190,000. He regretted that there was no Middle Island member in the Ministry. •I Mr. Hall said a general examination of the estimates* showed a considerable saving' but not much retrenchment. No Government could receive suebi a motion otherwise than as a want-of-confidenco' motion. Although ho was no supporter of the Government he would unhesitatingly vote against it.: •-' •■."' -:■■ ■', Mr. RonE3TON;pbjeoted ; tjo any party cry bet\Yepn North and South being raised. The South was perfectly willing^ td'66ntribnte a fair amount for the maintenance of peace in the North, and they; had, no reason to regret the arrangement made last year, or desire t<> alter it. ''HedidinotiliUo th'a fo«m of motion or the remarks accompanying. it. Ho would, however, support it on broad grounds, as forming a distinction between parties on what was' really' tho only tme basis,,that pf prudent •finance against epecniativ^ borrowing. Hb would; set his, face, against.'any expenditure boyoud their lneana. There were saffloient iaets before the. E[ouae to make them pauae before, committing! ; the coiintry 'to a policy which, might cud in a serious financial disaster. The, : ,permanent...charges', and interest; :rioW amounted, to half a njiTliou-^oiit'of a reTenue ot £900,0001 T,ho Governor's Bpeeqia haSleft it. to ; the. House to- bring "the expenditure within their means'. No one believed that the .deßiredendwouldbeobtained by the Treaswi'oij's policy. He would, tjirougll c'onimg 'session's; i^teu4ily; vote for. retrenchment; .' : "'. ~ ,|i>:.., .EjATHGAa^ tshoixght' *if 'the; Treas'ur ar; w.ere sincere in the peroration' eontaine'd in .Che statenient, h'e r!would glatlly hajre accepted , the., inotiop. 'He '/would-"support evieisy.ipotion h^viii^^^retreiDchment as 'itß Qb Ije,ct ; ;.He, thought iip rpubordinate official's sai^ry •Blip l uld 'exceed' £500.per anaum; A large saying was' possiblo oii thb'defence1 expenditure. To maintaiii a standing army vv;is uuconstitulionaL The settlers should i.ake .firearms into their' own' hands, and defend , themselves. He would take a ; contract.... to" preserve the peace I&E very, much' less "than £200,000 a year, .His . ji^iiutituchts felt the heavy .burdens of taxation intottfrable, aud: he bad no sympathy with Mi;. Rdlleston'a profesiions

of willingness to spend a million in defen™ at the rate of £100,000 a year. The wW never closed its capital account, and H|,{ railway nompauies that followed the 'gam course, it was sure to come to grief H thought the abolition of provincial institu. 9 tions would rather have a tendency to increasa expenditure than save the pocket of \h taxpayer. Belying on the Act paseed ]«st session, the Otngo Provincial Council had passed all their Estimates, and now a toVj change of policy, which put Otago £27,000Q the bad, was proposed. He coulj, not supnoß-. uch a policy. There was no fixity i n jL^ " The laud revenue would be the nextthi/jP'\ taken. He claimed it as the property of tVi provinces, and would never consent to have it diverted from local purposes. The proposed policy would leave Otago without a penny from the colony. It was t<ue they got half the stamp duties, and a subsidy for the conatruction of roads, but that was no boon Otago paid one-third of the stamp revenue'and interest on the loan. He urged tha G-overnrnent to agree to the motion.

Messrs. Haughton, Brown (Canterbury) - Reynolds, BrandoD, J. McLean, Richardson •-. Macandrew, Eoeves, and Eyee opposed, the *■ motion, as, although nnxioua to affect retrenchYnerit, s"tlifey thought a • false i^sue had beenraised.l ,- ■'%.< .' ;'' .■■, >j ' » -Tj Mr. WiLHAMSONrnado a violent attack oil** Mr* Gillias, undoppbsed the motion. -7., Messrs. CALOEB«.ud Shephebd (Dunedin) advocated retrenchmenl:, expressing regret that the question'- had "been raised in such a - shape. >j

i Mr. Wakefield supported the motion. § Mr. Pox replied. BsTbe House then"divided, the reeu.lt being 15 for arid 43 againßt the motion, f The dirision list was as follows :— Fob the Motion. — Rollestob, . Q-illj es ■ Stafford, Bathgate1, Reid, Wood, Cantcell, it." ■ Richardson, Ingles, Bradshaw, WakoiieJd, .Brown (Olago)1, Munro, Creighton; Collins. • . i*) AjGAlNST.—Haughto.n, Eyes, Biflney, Macaudroiy, Halli. St.urtbislme/ Webster, Vogef/-^ D.! Macleaxi, Gisbpriie, C. Parker, McLeod, Kateue,; Pearce, Parata- Andrew Clark, Peacocke, Tribe, W. Kelly, iiiraitiana, B. Kiohardson. Brown (Canterburj), Reeves, T. Kelly, HarrVsori;" T£iralake, ■ Oa;ringtpn, ,&. Enrker.-.f^ Rejyriolcls; Taiaoroa, Fon, Hunter, *' Fsir'tiaH, McGillivray, HeiderSon, Williamson, O'lNeill, Gt-. McLean, Mclherson, E. T. Gillon, Johnston.' ■•' '■'4 rip ' p *■ ■~->. - f : ;,. ; 1.15 Jl.mV Inquiry respecting' tie grounding of tKeU,; Lady J3ird on Barrett's Beef;on Saturday.!; ;Th.c (3-ovcrnbr'droVe the' fii-st pile of the Hatb Bridgo tdrduy. Volunteers attflnded. Artillery firecl a salute. The day wm obseryed as a public holiday. ■ Arrived. —Fhoebe, froni the North. The inquiry respecting the grounding of the Tell, decided that it was an error in; the judgment of the master. . . . '_ Lady Bird ran on Barrett's Beef yesterday, and returned to port in a; leaky oon-;/ dition. ; ■ ,--.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18710926.2.13.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Auckland Star, Volume II, Issue 534, 26 September 1871, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
947

MR. CREIGHTON'S MOTION. Auckland Star, Volume II, Issue 534, 26 September 1871, Page 2

MR. CREIGHTON'S MOTION. Auckland Star, Volume II, Issue 534, 26 September 1871, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert