Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE NEWMARKET SLAUGHTERHOUSE.

T8 the Editor of the Evjeking- Stab. Sir, — In looting over your paper of Friday last, I see a comment in it about the libel case against the Inspector «of Slaughter-houses. Now, sir, my opinion is that Mr. Carter does not do justice to the people if he does not at once prove his charge against Richards, and allow the man fair play, to show whether he is innocent or not, as perjury is a very grave charge for one man to publish against another, without at first proving it. It is a known fact that what Richards swore to in the Court was every word true, and I think the Superintendent did a grave injustice to everybody at large by protecting Carter against the charge of libel; and if he did not libel him, why be frightened to produce the document that Carter wrote ? In the first place it is known that Richards' license is stopped through petty spite, urged on by one of the butchers at tho Slaughter-house, on account of Richards getting some of this party's killing to do, and likely lo get more if he gets his license back. The same butcher has two men working for him who were boarding at Richards', and through the same thing showing spite, he told them if they did not at once leave off boarding there he would discharge them. Now, sir, if Mr. Carter can confirm all he has said against the man, why was he not brought before the Justice of Peace, and have fair play on both sides, and not allow a man to be so injured through spite ? It is well Mr. Carter is so much protected, or the Superintendent would have inquired into a letter received by him about a bullock Mr. Carter had that died on his hands, and found out what became of it; and while the Superintendent cloaks such things as these, -what can we expect but worse ? If we all help to pay a man like Carter it should be to do justice, not injustice ; and it is to be hoped the Superintendent will yet have the consciencfi to pee fair play done.—l am, &c, A Loveb ot? Fatr Play.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18710123.2.12.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Auckland Star, Volume II, Issue 324, 23 January 1871, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
373

THE NEWMARKET SLAUGHTERHOUSE. Auckland Star, Volume II, Issue 324, 23 January 1871, Page 2

THE NEWMARKET SLAUGHTERHOUSE. Auckland Star, Volume II, Issue 324, 23 January 1871, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert