RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Auckland Star, Volume I, Issue 280, 2 December 1870, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Friday.

[Before Tho.nas Beekham, Esq., R.M.]

Jttdmf.nt for Plait/tiff.—Auckland. Consolidated Gold Mining Company v. D. Rollo, £7 10.;., calls ; same v. .T. R." Watts, £3 17s. ; William Johnson v. Robert Borthwick, £2 2s. 2d. ; G. S. J:ikins v. George Spinks, £4 Ids. Bd. ; Teutonic Gold Mining Company v. J. C. Morphett, £2 17s. ; John Kelly v. George Dunnett, £0 10s., promissory note; W. R. Waddell v. James Benstead, £2 10s., use and occupation ; F. Brooks v. R. J. Murray, £i lGs. Bd., balance of account; A. E. Eyre v. George Worrall, Bl 16a; Antonio Gazzio v. Frank Cozaonee, £S, money lent; Alfred Dornwell v. John Jolinsou, unsatisfied judgment. £2 6s 6J ; 8. Marks v. Alfred Barchard, £2 13s.

Nonj-tj.its.—Walters and West v. George Henry Clarke (case heard a fortnight ago.1) Casks Adjourned.—Henry Elliot v. T. G. Wall, £20 for water supply (for a month) ; Auckland Consolidated Gold Mining Couipany v. John Taylor, £3 15s; Fred Sclmltz v. James Knight., £1, salary (£1 2s. 2d. paid into Court) ; R. Whitson and Co. v. Lawrence Robertson, £3 2s. ; W. O. llamlin v. David Troan, £20, trover ; William M. Gr. Hay v. Chas. E. Knapp, £1 4s. defended oases. Teutonic Gold Mining Company v Martin Sholl.—Claim . £9, for calls oq 90 shares.—Mr. Hesketh for the plaintiff; Mr. Tyler for the defendant. —After evidence had been heard a nonsuit was uccepsed by the plaintiff. Maurice Foley v. Richard Vanck. — Claim £7 18s. 3d., for goods supplied.—Mr. Hesketh for the plaintiff, and Mr. Tyler for the defence. —All witnesses were ordered out of Court.