RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT

Auckland Star, Volume I, Issue 191, 19 August 1870, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT

Fbiday,

[Before Thomas Beckham, Esq., R.M.] Undefended Cases.

Judgment foe Plaintiff.—iuckland Consolidated G.M.C. v. Robert Tassell, £18 15s; Golds boro t. Thos. Castles, £7 103; R. Wylde Brown v. C. H. Otway, £2 2s 4d; Trustees of Lockw ood t. Lepine ; G. V. Drycien v. Isaac Currie, £8; Wm Rose v.R.Borlhwick, £1 4s ; Wm. Broad v. Andrew Gould, £3 15-1; A. Philip y. H. Berne, £3 2s ; Carey, Gilles and Co. v. Knight and Kenward, £18 3s 7d; Frank Laccovi v. John Inkskip, £8 14« 6d; W. J. Vance and Co. v- Geo Clode, £16 15s 6d ; Porter and Co. v. Great Republic Gold Mining Company, £9 9s 6d ; I)ornwell v. James, £14.

Cases Adjottened.

Marquis of Hastings Gold Mining Company v. Ruddanklan, 10s, calls ; Porter and Co. t. O'Brien, £3 10-< ; North Island Q-old Mining Company v. Pornwell, £5, calls ; same t. Hewin, £5, calls.

Defended Cases, noeth island gold mining company V. CHiS. BURTON".

Claim, £5 for calls. Mr. Sheehan for the plaintiff, and Mr. Wynn for the defendant. The defence was, that "the whole thing was a swindle," and that the defendant was, therefore, entitled to get out of paying the calls if he could.

A nonsuit was recorded, on the ground that the defendant had not received proper notice of the making of the call.

LEWIS BROTHEItS V. "MI73T AND CO. Claim £20, damages. Mr. Wynn stated there wa3 an application to be made to the judge of the Supreme Court in reference to this very case, which might settle the mat ter. He therefore asked for an adjournment until next Friday. The adjournment waj agreed to. This was all the business before-the Conrt.