Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POLICE COURT.—Thursday.

(Before A. Betham, Esq., and R. F. Porter,

Esq., J.P's.

DRUNKENNESS.

Margaret Conway, John Fitzsymonds, and John Martin were each fined 55., frith costs, or to be imprisoned for twenty-four hours with hard labour. DBITNK AND DISOEDERLY. Joseph Symonds pleaded guilty to having been drunk, and having, on the evidence of Constable Wadman, been shown to have been also disorderly, was fined 20s. and costs, or to be imprisoned forty-eight hours with hard labor. MUNICIPAL POLICE ACT, 1866. W. J. Messenger was charged with a breach of this Act in having exposed meat for sale on shelves projecting over the footpath, contrary to the 15th sub-section of section 5. One of his men appeared, and pleaded guilty, and defendant was fined 20s. and costs. IMPOUNDING- ACT, 1869. James Linsey pleaded guilty to a breach of the above Act, in having tethered s horso on the green on Barrack Hill, and was fined 20s. and costs. DANGEEOTTS GOODS ACT, 1869. Samuel Brown was charged with a breach of the above Act, in having stored, on the 13th June, in certain premises in Chancerylane, and not included in his Dangerous Goods Act License, twenty-four tins of kerosene oil, liable to give off inflammable gas at a temperature under 110 degrees, Fahrenheit.

Defendant pleadc ' uilty, aud stated that, having a liceuse, he was not aware that he had been transgressing the Act. Mr. Wynn appeared for the City Board, and said that he had no desire to press for a heavy penalty. It was the first case of the kind, and he believed defendant was not aware of the offence, as it had been stored in a portion of his premises to which his license did not apply. But it was desired that it should be publicly known that in every future case the stringent provisions of the 4ct would be enforced. The Bench stated that it was compulsory to forfeit the goods, and as they appeared to have power, they inflicted the mitigated penalty of 20s. and costs.

The Court then rose.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18700616.2.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Auckland Star, Volume I, Issue 136, 16 June 1870, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
342

POLICE COURT.—Thursday. Auckland Star, Volume I, Issue 136, 16 June 1870, Page 2

POLICE COURT.—Thursday. Auckland Star, Volume I, Issue 136, 16 June 1870, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert