AKAROA RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
Biokouh Justin Ayi.mkh, Esq., RM. Friday. Fkb. 4, 1881. civil cases. Breitmeyer v. Rees. —Claim £4 lGs Judgment by default for the amount claimed with costs. ■ ' - Kissel v. Orchard.—Judgment summon?. Ordered to pay in two equal instalments on the 13th February and March. Masefield v. Harper.—ln this case Mr Henning, for plaintiff, applied for a rehearing, on tbe ground that the Bench had improperly rejected certain evidence tending to show that defendant's men had been in the habit of clearing their survey linps by firing them. Mr Nalder appeared for defendant, and opposed the rehearing. His Worship did not see how the rejected evidence' could affect the decision in this ease, which was that there was no evidence to connect defendant's party with the lire in question. Mr Henning was proceeding to argue as to the weight of the evidence adduced on either side, when His Worship said he should decline to re-open tho 'case. ■ The j application would be refused. The Cuurl then adjourned. J
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AMBPA18810208.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume V, Issue 474, 8 February 1881, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
170AKAROA RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Akaroa Mail and Banks Peninsula Advertiser, Volume V, Issue 474, 8 February 1881, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in