Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE RUA CASE.

AUCKLAND, October 3. An "eloment of doubt" was the reason given by the "jury in the Supreme Court for* returning a verdict of ribt guilty in .the case of Tuke Tuko Kav nara, a follower of Rua, who was charged with int-ention to do grievous bodily harm to Constable Skinner 'and attempting to discharge a gun at him at Maungapohatu .on April 2, "the date of the " prophet's " "arrest. The case had occupied seven days.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG19161004.2.22.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Ashburton Guardian, Volume XXXVI, Issue 3571, 4 October 1916, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
78

THE RUA CASE. Ashburton Guardian, Volume XXXVI, Issue 3571, 4 October 1916, Page 5

THE RUA CASE. Ashburton Guardian, Volume XXXVI, Issue 3571, 4 October 1916, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert