Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTERIAL.

ABHBORTON— THURSDAY. (Before Mr 0. A. Wray, R.M.) MAINTENANCE. George Parkin wai charged by Lis wife, Elzibeth Ann Parkta, with fating to comply with an order of the Oourt, o«lllng on him to pay a certain anm weekly towards the maintenance of his wife and family — Mr Orlap appeared for oomElalnant, Mr Wilding for defendant. — defendant on being oalled did not appear. — It km stated that defendant had slnoe the order was made m November got Into arrears In his payments to the extent of £19 —After argument between oonniel the Magistrate said that if the arrears were Dot paid, or some satisfactory ar* rangement made for their payment, before next Oourt day tbe defendant would have to go to gaol for three months. DOG BIGISTRATIOK AOT. For falling to register dogs the following owners were fined 10s : — 0. Primmer, J. L. Brown, G. Vlooent, W. Simpson, J. Mile*, H. W. Barrett (2), H. W. Dogget, J. Jones (2), A. Eagleton, L. Pass, B. Batler, E. G. OrUp, R. MoOwen (2), J. Malford, W. G. Wallace. A couple of other case were adjourned. DBONKEKNEB3? B, Gallagher, for having been drunk while In oharge of a horse and cart was fined 20a and costs. OIVIL OASES. W. Bjylln v W. Judd, jadgment summons £3 9s sd. Order made for Immediate payment, m default 14 days imprison mint J, Orr *nd 00. v Gastavus Fox, jadgment summons £5 2s 6d. Order made for payment within a month, In default 14 days Imprisonment. J. 0. Bell v D. Wilson and another, olalm 810 4». Mr Outhbertson for the plilPtlff. Mr Wilding (or difeodiot, Tht n

facts of this esse, which has been before the Court on several oooasions, were that defendant sold oartaln goods belonging to one Graham under a bill of sale. There was a surplus remaining over from the sale, which was paid to Qe sham's landlord v and Graham soon after going through the B»nkruptoy Oonrt, the Deputy Offioa' Assignee sought to reoovßr this surplus— whioh he alleged was Improperly paid away — for the benefit of the general body of oredltors In Graham's estate. Mr Orlsp was joined In tbe defecoa at previous hearings, but the Magistrate ruled that he was not llab'e to the plaintiff and ordered a nonsuit. The Assignee was now proceeding against Mr D. Wilson.— After evldenoe had been token tbe Magistrate reserved his decision. Pyne and Co v W. Taylor, olalm £45 Evldenoe was taken on commission m this case, it beiug one before tbe Oourt at Chrlstohuroh; The Oourt then roae. mmm—mm—mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18890516.2.30

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 2136, 16 May 1889, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
429

MAGISTERIAL. Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 2136, 16 May 1889, Page 3

MAGISTERIAL. Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 2136, 16 May 1889, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert