MAGISTERIAL.

Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 1902, 26 July 1888, Page 3

MAGISTERIAL.

ASBBURTON— THURSDAY.

(Before Mr O. A. Wray, R M.) UNREGISTERED DOGS. For having unregistered chgs m their possession, the following »•«*« fined : — David Grant, 10.; S. Bellamy, 10 j ; A. Ferrai, 10j. Al LAKGE. P. Sheehan, for baviog allowed three cowi to wander on a pub'io road was fiacd 5a and costs. Edmund Willfama was charjrrd with allowing a oow to be at large. Mr Or'sp appeared for defendant and applied for an adjournment whicH was granted, Alfred Carson was charged with allowing a horse to wander on a road within the borough. A fine of 5i wlihcui coats wasltfHcted. OBIMNEY ON WRB For having allowed a chimney of his home tfebe on fire Robert Smith was fined LrJtlthcat costs. AN APPLICATION, Thomas M#gee applied for a remission of the fine thai had been it footed on him for neglecting to comply with an order of the .Court directing him to remove a home on wheels that was obstructing » thoroughfare m the Longbe&oh road district. — From the facts of the oaie the Magistrate saw no reason whatever to reconsider the former deolslin.

civil casks Ooldstream Road Bjard v Jana Jaok ■on, olaim 18s 9d. The sum of 1b 5d had been paid into Court. Judgment was given for the balance and costs 21s. A. KamnUzsr y J. H. Fowler, claim £3 3s. Mr Crisp for plaintiff- Judgment for plaintiff Mitchell and Tamer v H. Taylor, claim £14 5s 6d. Judgment for plaintiff by default P. McGoire v W. B Oompton, claim £1 6s. Mr Purnell fur plaintiff. Mr Cuthbertion for. defendant applied for an adjournment, as a material witness on bis tide could not attend and his client was absent. Mr Purnell objected io an adjournment. Judgment for plaintiff, Golditream Road Board v W. Jaokson, claim 2a Id for rates. Mr Crisp for defendant* Defendant denied having] reoeired any notice of the rate. Mr Orisp took several technical objections v'z, to the form of demand, also m regard to the notice of rate, and as to the signatures to the rate book not being proposed to be those of members of the Board. The Magistrate reserved his decision m order to consider the points raised by Mr Crisp A. Ksmollzer v 0. Phyilo, claim £1 2s 6i. Mr Orlop for plaintiff. Judgment for plaintiff, Charlotte Bishop v E. Christian, claim 4s 6d. The defendant had occupied a bouse belonging to plaintiff and white m oooopanoy some damage was caused to a atore, for which plaintiff now claimed. Judgment for plaintiff. The Court then rose.