Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TRANSUBSTANTIATION.

TO XHR EDITOR. Sib,— Yonr issue of the 14th Inst. contained a letter signed "A Constant Reader," to which, with your kind indul-' gence, I beg briefly to refer. Your|correspondent's argument from beginning to end are most absurd, and soarcely worth noticing. The matter la one of "interpretation and authority / It resolves itself into the old controversy " Catholicism v. Protestantism." .... I naturally conclude that he upholds the teaching of the Church which is loud In boaot of its female Pope, Queen Elizabeth, and it will be for him to establish by proof the authority, the Cl.urch m question has for teaching, after which it will be his province to acquaint mo from whence do their Order — whom I regard aa gowned usurpers — oome : if through the female line or what. Then we will proceed with our controversy. Aa for hie query : " how can John XL. refer to the Sacrament when it bad not yet been Instituted ?" It clearly condemns your correspondent, and pronounces him an "ignoramus." Did St Jobn write his Gospel before Christ's death ? Certainly not ! It was after tho death of Our Lord that St John's Goapel waft written, and I would advise your correspondent to avoid rushing into print, and thus save himself being made a victim of ridicule. Any intelligent man will at once conclude that he dooß not know' what he is talking about, and, Eeforo bp attempts' to attack truths which 0 cannot effectively ridicule, ho had etter communicate with Bishop Sut6r — anpther of the reformed party — to help him m his work. Trusting that he will do as I ask of him at the beginning of my letter, and alao p}ace hia signature to bis letter, lam, etc., J.-0.-M. P. [Oar correspondent will observe that wo have omitted from his letter certain phrase 3 and paesages which have nothJng whatever'to do with hia argument, and savor unpleasantly of the odium tjifiologicum. Argument between Ohriatlan.3 should purely be capable of being conducted without the n«e cf termn calculated to give pain or offence. — Ed]

IfcThe new Commiseion of the Peaoe has just been issued as a supplement to the Gazette. The number of names included is 1489. The Patea paper says : — " Mr Hamerton, solioitor, opened the case and set out the points on which he lied for the verdict m bis fftYW" Bwd w ttw lawyer,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18880317.2.19.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 1792, 17 March 1888, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
393

TRANSUBSTANTIATION. Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 1792, 17 March 1888, Page 3

TRANSUBSTANTIATION. Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 1792, 17 March 1888, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert