EXPULSION OF BARON ROTHS CHILD FROM AUSTRIA

Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 1749, 25 January 1888, Page 3

EXPULSION OF BARON ROTHS CHILD FROM AUSTRIA

Acoordlng to the Cologne "Volkzeltung," Baron Nathaniel Rothaohlld— not the chief of th 9 great plutocratic houee— has been expelled from Vienna. The Baron 1b « great florist, and iv all hla ▼Mas and catties carries on the cultaro ot tare exctlo plant* upon a very costly acale. The Archduke Karl Ludwig, the Emperor's brother, visited one of the Baron's gardens daring the absence of the owner, m order to get a glimpse of come of his rare plautß, The Archduke is tha foremost paron of art and «oleoce In the empire, and a great favorite with the cultivated classes of the people Baron Rothsoh>l4|had given the order that no one should bo allowed to inspeot his foroing houses daring his absence ; but the head gardener conceived that the order ooald not extend to so important. a persooage as Oeiar's brother, and so admitted the Arohdake. When the Baron heard that his order had b?ea violated, he at onoe dismissed the head gardener. The Arohdake wro'.e to the Baron begging him to revoke the dismissal. Tho great monetary Prince, however, would not grant the petition of the Imperial Prino?. The mnaloipallty if Vhcna were indignant at th* rudeness of ( the Jew ' to the mostpipalar aid liberal member of tha Impelal family ; and gave tho B*r< n to understand that he mast either concede the Archduke's request or forfeit his own oltfamship. The Bironchiaa tha latter alternative, and has voluntarily ceased to be an • Austrian ' He hoe thaa been indirectly expelled fry the democratic v >ico. The Cologne j mrrul rem»iks that the Vienna papcr-3, which are t»'U»lly rezkored amongst the so called ' Judenprosoe ' of HJutopo, have takan no notio9 of this very curious incident.