SUPREME COURT
, ♦ Wellington, January 4. The Supreme Court Criminal Seaiom oommenoed Ihfa morning before Juitioa Richmond. There Is no o*se of a isriona nature The charge to the grand jary contained nothing of interaat. Ddnbdin, January*. In charging the grand jary Judge William*, referring to the K«itangita arson c»se, said thai by an extraordinary mtsaonception oa the part of the committing Magistrate the wife of the accused had given evidence, but she wat dearly incompetent. In a oasß nnder the Deitl* tote Persona Ao< there was, he said, «onalderable doubt as to whether under the Statute the wife'a evidence «raa properly receivable, but the question traa arguable. — Fred. Flint, for obtaining money under false nrateneOTrigotrtfrro jaajriL „ mmm (mm -~
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18880104.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 1731, 4 January 1888, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
118SUPREME COURT Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 1731, 4 January 1888, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in