Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTERIAL

ASHBURTON-THURSDAY (Before Mr John Olllvler, R.M ) DBUNKENMBSS. A man who was treated as a first offended was fined 5s and costs with the «iual alternative, FAOBIBITIOK ORDER. A prohibition order waa applied for against Richard Lancaster. — Mr Purnell appeared for Mr Lancaster. Evidence having been taken the Magistrate a»id that though ho had no doubt Lancaster would be benefitted by an order being made against him still as he objected so strongly the order would not be made. CIVIL oases. Hogg v. Lovett claim £7 13j.— Jndg. ment for plaintiff for the amount claimed. Z wider and Co. v Q. Harrii, claim £10 8s 9d.— Judgment by default for,, the I amount claimed and costs

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18871013.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 1686, 13 October 1887, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
116

MAGISTERIAL Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 1686, 13 October 1887, Page 2

MAGISTERIAL Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 1686, 13 October 1887, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert