THE RADCLIFEE CASE
Christohuroh, Ootober 7. The police here explain that the reason of the apparent discrepancies offered In the Radoliffe case at Adelaide m regard to the date of the warrant issued foe his arrest was that the warrant really waß isaued on September 3rd, as telegraphed to Adelaide before Oonatable ' Stunner left here. It was ascertained that this warrant was not sufficiently explicit, and another was substituted foe it, dated September 6th. Hence the statement made that the warrant had been issued on September 3rd was quite correct. Justice Boucant, m giving judgment, commented very severely on the discrspanoy, but it appears that there wa=* really no reason for blaming tho police here.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18871008.2.16
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 1682, 8 October 1887, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
115THE RADCLIFEE CASE Ashburton Guardian, Volume VII, Issue 1682, 8 October 1887, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in