THE INTRODUCTION OF SPARROWS.
' At a recent meeting of the (Canterbury Acclimatisation Society, the Chairman (the Hon I. T. Peaoocs) stated that sparrows had not been imported to the colony by the Society, but that the progenitors of the myilads which now •devastate' our haivest fields were five birds introduced and liberated by a sea captain, from whcm the Society had declined to purchase the. birds. The Waimate Times is not satisfied with this statement, and says :—“ The writer of this present article was a resident of Christchurch from September, 1862, to June, 1867, sod well remembers the' arrival at Lyttelton between. these dates' r (probably in 1863 or 1864) of a ship (he it was named the Marlborough),
the manifest.of which wee as usual puo-1 lished in the morning papers, and from I which it appeared that she hadbrought I oat a lot of English birds, among which I were chaffinches, greenfinches, and either I 100 or 200 sparrows. Knowing what I ailachief these birds did in the English I agrlenUttral districts, the Writer drew I the attention of Mr George Tribe, then! " editor of an evening paper in Christchurch, to t)>6 matter, and at the request of that gentleman wrote an article, which was published in the Mail, warning the public of Km-’danger of turning these birds loose ioNew Zealand, and predicting.: that if this - were done legislation WOttld ere tong he needed to .cope with the evil# which Would result. That prediotion, it is needless to say, has been verified, end the facta just given clearly show that the five libtris referred to by Mr Peadock by no means account for the origin of *he, sparrow nuisance, thongh no aoobt they had their share in it We do soy Positively that the Society turned out the sparrows which arrived by tiie Marlborough (if that was her name), but we have a strong impression that they did, or at least that they were liberated under the auspices of the Society—was it by Mr F»rr, we'wonder? Well, it is neatly a quarter of a century ago, and , It is hard fb recollect precisely, but any- - Jjodywbo is, curious to enquire can, by following up the thread we have given, very easily ascertain.
' August Flower. —The most miserable beings in the world are those suffering from dyspepsia and liver complaint. More than 7$ per cent of the people are afflicted with these two diseases and their effects; such as sour stomach, sick headache, habitual costiveness, palpitation of the heart, heartburn, waterbrash, gnawing and burning pains at the pit of the stomach, yellow skin, coated tongue and disagreeable'taste in'the mouth, coming up of food after eating, low spirits, etc. Go to your druggist and get a bottle of august flower. TImS valuable medicine has cured thousands and'tbbnsands of Sufferers, and is known in all civilised countries. Two doses will relieve you. It costs only 3s 6d a bottle. Sample bottles, 6d.—[Advt. Holloways Ointment and Fills.— Outward Infirmities.—Before the discovery of these remedies many case of sores, ulcers, &c., were pronounced to be hopelessly incurable, because the treatment pursued tended to destroy (Strength it .was incompetent to preserve, and to exasperate the symptoms it was inadequate to - remove. Holloway’s Pills exert the most wholesome powers over the unhealthy flesh or skin, without debarring the patient from fresn air and exercise, and thus constitutional vigor is husbanded while the, most malignant ulcers, abscesses, and skin diseases are in process of cure. Both Ointment and Pills make the blood richer and purer, instead of permitting it to fall into that ppqr and watery state so fatal to many shoring under hronic ulcerations, —[Advt.l j . The Bad and Worthless i are never imitated or counterfeited. This is especially irae of a family medicine, and it t is proof that the remedy imitated is of the bjgLegt value. As soon as it has been { lested%nd proved by the whole world that Hop Bitter* was the purest, best, and most valuable family medicine on earth, many imitations sprung up and began - to steal the notices in < which the press and the people of the country .’bad expressed themerits of H. 8., and in ' every way trying to induce suflering invalids • ,„tp use. tjisir slntt instead, expecting to make v immejt *» the'ereditand uoad name of H. B. .Mfay Gthen> Btarted nostrums put up in sirailair .afyle” to H r 8,, with variously devised “ ’ iamte in which the word “ Sop ” or “Hops ” ‘ wereuaed to induce people to believe they were the same as Hop Bitters. All such pretended, remedies or cures,'no matter what ‘ th«r style or name is, and especially those wUhjtbcword “Hop” or “Hops” in their name or In any way connected with them or dheieun9SMvr?aTe - imitations or - counterfeits. Beware .of them. Touch none of them. Use DOthihgTmt genuine American Hop Bitters, with a bunchor duster of green Hops on the "Write IdbeV*ud Dr Soule’s name blown in the %tSsJ nothing else.' . Druggists and dealing m imita
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18850223.2.19
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Ashburton Guardian, Volume V, Issue 1471, 23 February 1885, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
829THE INTRODUCTION OF SPARROWS. Ashburton Guardian, Volume V, Issue 1471, 23 February 1885, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.