LOCAL GOVERNMENT.
. XO TUB JiiPxTOB. gjn,—Year correspondent“ Water,” in Monday’s issue has evidently been well . treated by the County Council. Bellas no doubt had water distributed all over, his farm, probably from the rates raised in the suburbs. What would “ Water ” , bare said if the Gouncil had spent the money paid by him inrates in asphalting our footpaths or giving us a water supply? . “ Salt Water ” would then pro t '-M-c been his nom de plume, for what a lot he -would have shed. v Are we in the suburbs not right in up* holding that body in Which we have an interest, and by which we are benefited. 1 quite agree with “Water” that the - -Council baa doni its work well, and they fre quite welcome to the amount they aver wived from ns, but tempora mutanturetiws mutamiir in illis, therefore I dbt»ot seeany reason why we should bn rated'any !oncer by a body who hive no - interest in ns further than the amount of - rate*- they on squeeze out of us. if “ Watte” desires thafthe Couhty Council should still, exist, by all means let it do ko ; only Itt them subsist upon a water* rath specially struck upon those who reap ill the of wafer supply, not, the - lent of-which is the great increase in the yslue of Mud ; truly an unearned increment ; or rather, earned by some at the • *ttdn v e of all i Will epdeayqr to explain to “ Water /Shy' the ratepayers have more control ' dyer tho Road Boards—-(I) They have ■ representation; (2) they have ' -- anfinal mpetineg of ratepayers, it which ■ ‘ the'whole Work of the Boards and their "/expenditure for the year is submitted for ' their/approval or otherwise, which undoubtedly makes these bodies very careful in their transactions. I would like to ask “ Water ” how can the ratepayers control the County Coun* cilt ■Do they as a body ever come be* / fore the ratepayers 7 I’o they ever ask - them to confirm their actions and expen* - Dothey ever consult them about ;' approachable;-! may say, as the Czir of /?■\ Russia, ratepayers may ccm»» and go, but the Council may go on for ever striking LS./iSatea and spending money without any s^nMthacfc' 5 -''' *- : - «- • «Water ” imagines we can have as J -/-/Counties Act says not less than six nor ' ,v * /more than nine. I ask him would all :'r|lhterest» be fairly represented if we had] . ///tb* huger number 7 As a matter of fact , t:; /wean> to have only seven, or one for |e«ch road district If the Boards are will one man be able to look i * after the district he represents; decidedly ■ -not, the-whole thing would be left in the - * : - hands of the Engineer to do as he pleased lit the representatives would >r roads were properly main* e minor wants of any locality ’.it being impossible for one lA beaten-bora engineer, to le vants and Works of a' large this. ' That is' the very rea* pld Ashbhrton Road Board *osd the whole Pprnitv was nrepven Boards, don, I await anxiously your which I fancy he ardiwt to crack.«—l am, eta*, Awotrek Sbsubbak.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18840507.2.11.2
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Ashburton Guardian, Volume V, Issue 1247, 7 May 1884, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
517LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Ashburton Guardian, Volume V, Issue 1247, 7 May 1884, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.