RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.
ASHBURTON.— To-day, (Before H. 0. S. Baddeley Esq, R.M.) Murray v. McEvey, claim of LlO, for work done. —Mr Wilding, fer plaintiff, asked the Court to grant a certificate on the Mount Somers Road Board, that body being indebted to defendant on account of work done by the plaintiff in the present action Judgment was given for amount claimed with octets, the certificate asked for being also granted. Upper Ashburton Road Board V. Macrae, claim L2 ss.—On the application of Mr Crisp, who appeared for defendant, judgment was, with the consent of plaintiff, put off for a week, as there was a setoff of L2 ..gainst the Board. Judgment went by default in tba:following cases:—Upper Ashburton Road Board v. Strange and Fountainej 1,2 3s 9d ; Same v. Tisch, L 26» ; Robinson and Townshend v. Ibell, L 5 15s ; Lancaster v. McEvey, L 6 13s 4d; Quill ▼. McEvey, L 4 4s 6d; Same v. Craddock, LI 4s 6d; Macrae v. Gilligan, Lll IBs; Foots v. Hughes, L 5 15s 6<L
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18830824.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Ashburton Guardian, Volume IV, Issue 1030, 24 August 1883, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
172RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Ashburton Guardian, Volume IV, Issue 1030, 24 August 1883, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in