Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

ASHBURTON. -To-day,

Before Messrs C. P. Cox and R. Alcorn, yr 'i'.'-;*! ’! JUIT False Pretences.— Frederick Pavitt was brought up on a charge of obtaining about March 30th, 750 .bushels p£ wjipat from Rdwin- Thomas, j - under false pretences. Mr Purnell appeared for the defence. Sergeant Felton asked Idr fan ad j ou^nmeut,,. ,so J that a - material witness from Christchurch might be produced. Mr Purnell objected to the case being Adjoilfned] as he-)irUai quiteready to go on with it. The charge was a moat frivolous one, and there was not a tittle of evidence td support .it.—Sergeant Felton said that he had reason to believe that the accused had been hiding, and it wits only possible to present tbe wfitiyeft-v terday.—The case was accordingly adjourned for a week. CIVIL CASES! i'lA . - I

Martin’s Estate v. J. Corbett, claim LI 6s Bd.—Judgment was ( given for the amount claimed with? oi/rftas'.' ‘ ‘ Same v. Geddtngs, claim I2a lid.— Judgmentfor plaintiff with costs. BdrengH. 1 ’Obuncil v, Olsen, claim L 4 16a. —L2 16s was paid into Court. Judgment was given for that.ampuqfc.. iHblbdreu#! ’V.‘ 'tteatejf, claim* LBi fbr which judgment was given with costs. Connelly y. 3d, balance due as wages for threshing.— Mr Wilding appeared for plaintiff, and Mr Crisp for de^endapt.—Thp question to be decided was .wbethetia ment had been entered into between the plaintiff and defendant. After hearing the evidence, judgment was<giviW for defendant.

Morrow v. Harrison, claim Ll 9 4s, for work done in (barfing grairi ! f<Jr defendant —Mr Crisp for plaintiff, and Mr Wilding for defendant.—The defence was that the work referred to was loathe shape of neighbourly services, "and that it was never intended that any charge should be made. The for the plaintiff for L 7 10s, without professional coats.

Harrison v. Morrow, Claim L 8 10s 4d, the amount of a dishonored cheque.— There was no defence in this case, and judgment for 'the ■ ameunt claimed and costs was given.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18830510.2.10

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Ashburton Guardian, Volume IV, Issue 939, 10 May 1883, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
329

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Ashburton Guardian, Volume IV, Issue 939, 10 May 1883, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Ashburton Guardian, Volume IV, Issue 939, 10 May 1883, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert