Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

* ASHBURTON. —To-Day. (Before Mr J. N. Wood. R.M.) CIVIL CASKS. Clarke v. Firth. Claim LI 6s Id. Order for amount with costs. Martin v. Meharry. Mr Branson, for the plaintiff, said that the matter had been settled out of Court without his bein<j consulted. He applied for the case to b e heard. Solicitors had a right to be protected by the Court. The Magistrate saiil ho had no power to hear the case in th e absence of both plaintiff and defendant. Cas.e struck out.

Dunstan v. Muir. No appearance. Case struck out.

Spence v. Brydone. No appearance, Case struck out.

Jones v. Kelly. Claim for rent, L 9 10s. Mr O’Reilly for defendant. A witness named Samuel Guinney was called, but did not appear. Mr O’Reilly produced receipts paid subsequently to the last date mentioned in the claim. The claim for the first part of the rent was on Guinney, who took the place, not on Kelly. The Police Magistrate said that the plaintiff should not have let Guinney leave the house without making him pay. Guinney was apparently the right man to sue. Plaintiff was nonsuited, with LI Is costs. Reid and Gray v. Harvey. Claim, LI 7 13s on a promissory note. Mr Crisp foi ■ defendant. The manager for Reid and; Gray deposed as to the claim. By Mr Crisp: George Harvey’s signature is that, attached to the promissory note. I die I not see him write it. I senfhim notice of dishonor as soon as I got i c from Dunedin.. He gave the promissory note to me. Ik was for a plough. There was no promise to renew the note if required. Mr Crisp said that as the defendant had not thought fit to appear, and had tried to settle the matter behind his back, he could not say anything more. Order for amount, with costs 19s.

Spence v. Brydone. Claim for LI 16s. Order for amount, with LI 10s costs. Orr and Co. v. Pearce. Claim for LIOO. Mr Crisp, fir defendant, contended that under the 20th clause of the Act, the summons was not served within sufficient time. The Bencli concurred. Plaintiff was nonsuited without costs. The Court then adjourned.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18810722.2.10

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Ashburton Guardian, Volume 2, Issue 402, 22 July 1881, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
371

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Ashburton Guardian, Volume 2, Issue 402, 22 July 1881, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Ashburton Guardian, Volume 2, Issue 402, 22 July 1881, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert