Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE TRIAL OF MR. WHITELAW

The Jury Unable to Agree.

(bt telegeafh.)

Wellington, Yesterday.

The trial of Whitelaw occupied the Supreme Court all day. No new facts were elicited. The jury, after four hours deliberation, said that there was no chance of agreeing, and were locked up for the night.

Wellington, To-day.

During the hearing of the case yesterday, Mr Travers raised a point that the Mount View Asylum* not having been gazetted under the Lunatics Act, an indictment could not lie for an officer under the statute. The Crown Prosecutor admitted the non-proclama-tion, and the Judge said he thought the point fatal of course as for an offence under the statute. The third count, for a common assault, was removed, and the jury returned a verdict on it. It found that the act committed was in excess of authority, even without notice. On the Court resuming this morning, the jury, who had been locked up all night, stated there was no chance of their agreeing, and they were discharged. The Crown Prosecutor applied for a new trial. The counsel for the prisoner asked who was to pay for the second special duly. Judge Richmond said that, as a matter of law, the expense must fall on the prisoner, but he thought it would, under the circumstances, be graceful on the part of the Crown to pay the costs. The Crown Prosecutor said he would represent the matter to the Government, and endeavor to get them to pay the Lioa. The Judge asked the Crown Prosecutor ,if Ijp thought he could get over the non-proclamation of asylums, or otherwise make the charge merely one of criminal assault. Mr Izard replied that he could not A new trial by special jury was then ordered for Thursday, 21st instant. The prisoner was released on the same bail.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18810712.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Ashburton Guardian, Volume 2, Issue 393, 12 July 1881, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
305

THE TRIAL OF MR. WHITELAW Ashburton Guardian, Volume 2, Issue 393, 12 July 1881, Page 2

THE TRIAL OF MR. WHITELAW Ashburton Guardian, Volume 2, Issue 393, 12 July 1881, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert