To the Editor. Sir, —l see by the newspaper report that a letter from James Mcßae, stating that Richard Bird had applied for a license for a cab, of which he was not the owner, the owner of the cab being Charles Ryle ; and that the said cab was employed in carrying prostitutes. I think the above letter, if allowed to go unchallenged, would make it appear that I was something worse than the average humanity. I have instructed my solicitor to call upon James Mcßae to prove his assertion. In the meantime I should like, with your kind permission, to lay the facts of the case before the public. The said Charles Ryle was at a certain time (like many other people in Ashburton) in want of money. Mr*. Joshua Tucker and myself, purely to oblige the man, purchased the cab jointly, at the same time agreeing to sell it to him at the same price within a certain date. That time has gone by, and he has failed to buy back the cab. It was, therefore, determined to take out a license and let the cab to a driver at a weekly rental, without dictating to the driver what fares he should take. I don’t suppose, however, that he will get a monopoly of the characters referred to in James Mcßae’s letter.—l am, &c., R. Bird.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18800729.2.5.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Ashburton Guardian, Volume 1, Issue 132, 29 July 1880, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
228Untitled Ashburton Guardian, Volume 1, Issue 132, 29 July 1880, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.