Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE FARMER.

IS THE THISTLE A NUISANCE? One of the many things connected with farm management which attracted the attention of the Lincolnshire Delegates, in their tour of inspection throughout New Zealand (says the “ New Zealand Country Journal”), was the undisturbed possession, of the soil in many places permitted to the thistle —a weed against which an incessant crusade is maintained in England. Their astonishment was not lessened, on inquiring the cause, by being informed by some that, so far from being a nuisance, the thistle had come to be regarded as one of the surest and best means of preparing the soil for the luxuriant growth of grasses and corn. On the other hand, farmers are found who will tell you that the thistle is a terrible nuisance, robbing the soil of its nourishment, smothering grasses and clover alike, and completely usurping the ground for the time being. Those who advocate the thistle say that the roots penetrate to a great depth into the subsoil, and bring up large quantities of potash, etc., which is deposited on the surface, in their decaying stems and leaves, and that the vacancy left by the decaying roots opens the way to a great depth for water and air, the mechanical action of -which is to pulverise and render the subsoil more accessible to the roots of other plants ;no doubt this is true. The question naturally suggests itself, what is the cost of this natural mode of tillage? The thistle usually possesses the soil for at least three years, consequently the ground must remain unremunerative for that time ; if the thistle only invaded unreclaimed or exhausted soils much might be said in its favour, but unfortunately such is not always the case—on the contrary, it is partial to rich soils of all descriptions. We fancy that the secret of the impunity with which the thistle has been allowed to spread in this colony, arises more from a want of ability to cope with | the constantly recurring crops of this persistent plant, caused by the want of cheaper labour. That the soil is much improved by thistles is admitted by many who have had to cope with them, and that toleration is cheaper than extermination is also true; so that for the present the thistle must remain master of the position. There is just one comforting reflection, and that is, it leaves something behind it, according to its adcocates, as shown above, whereby the farmers may reap some after benefit.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG18800403.2.17

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Ashburton Guardian, Volume 1, Issue 82, 3 April 1880, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
417

THE FARMER. Ashburton Guardian, Volume 1, Issue 82, 3 April 1880, Page 2

THE FARMER. Ashburton Guardian, Volume 1, Issue 82, 3 April 1880, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert