Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Original Correspondence.

To the Editor of the Auckland Chronicle. r Sir,—ln your paper a few weeks since, appeared an extract from the Government Gazette, announcing the precise time at which certain Ordinances, passed during the la9t Session, were to come into operation ; among others was the " N uisance/' which was supposed to come into operation on the 17th of last month, (July) but to my astonishment, and I believe of the public generally, there are as many dngs about now as before the passing of the Bill; What is our Chief Police Magistrate about that he does not carry out the provisions of the Bill, by seeing 'that the Constables do their duly ? I hope, Mr. F.ditor,, the Chief Police Magistrate has not too many iu the fire and that his duties as Acting General will not prevent his attending U,. tt\e duties of Chief Police Magistrate.. By inserting these few lines in the corner of your Journal perhaps it may be the means of having the nuisance abated, and you wfi), confer a favour on A CONSTANT READER. Auckland, August 20th, lß4i, [We have no hesitation in inserting the above, and inform our corespondent that the Chief Police Magistrate, we have no doubt, will have the provisions of the " Dog IS uisance Ordinance " tarried out to the letter when he gets official instruc' tions with a copy of the Bill, neither of which has he yet received. We believe it is the wish of Mr. Mathew to have the town cleared of the nuisance complained of, as much as any Other person in Auckland, and further, we have no hesitation in saying our Chief Police Magistrate knows nothing more about the •' Dog Nuisance Act" than what he may have seen in the papers, which is not the authority for him to act on. —Ed. Chron.] To the Editor of the Auckland Chronicle. Sib.—Please to give this a place in your valuable paper. If you cannot avoid a quarrel with a blackguard—let your Lawyer manage it, rather than yourself, no man sweeps his own chimney-—but employs a chimneysweeper, who has no objection to dirty work because it is his trade. Another.— Of the professions it may be said that Soldiers are beooming too popular, Parsons to lazy, Physicians t o o mercenary, and Lawyers too. powerful. . A SUBSCRIBER AND FRIEND. Aiumst 21st, 1844.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ACNZC18440822.2.14

Bibliographic details

Auckland Chronicle and New Zealand Colonist, Volume 2, Issue 55, 22 August 1844, Page 3

Word Count
393

Original Correspondence. Auckland Chronicle and New Zealand Colonist, Volume 2, Issue 55, 22 August 1844, Page 3

Original Correspondence. Auckland Chronicle and New Zealand Colonist, Volume 2, Issue 55, 22 August 1844, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert