Ourt contemporary the "Times'" has noticed the extraordinary verdict of Klli>"s aeipiital 00 the Brsj aient tea Green, with intent We paid particular attention to nee as above not a doubt as |o his guilt, and much surprised at the finding of the Although Horton to ace: have been an accomplice at the commencement of this atlair, fe| it is, more than probable from his subsequent conduct, that any part be in it was compulsory, or through tear, for it is stated he j information to parties when they first touched uiga, and voluntarily came forward to give e- when he arrived at Auckland in the small Schooner. He swore point blank to the fact that Bus shot Green, &c. If no cr en to a man who is admitted as evidence for the Crown, what good is it to put him In tlie witness box ? There was not a par of evidence to contradict liortons statement, while there was much to corroberate and establish it. Happily for the public such a vidian is not yet let Io . and we only regret that the second often which he was found guilty did not admit of a greater punishment than asportation.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ACNZC18440314.2.6
Bibliographic details
Auckland Chronicle and New Zealand Colonist, Volume 2, Issue 32, 14 March 1844, Page 2
Word Count
200Untitled Auckland Chronicle and New Zealand Colonist, Volume 2, Issue 32, 14 March 1844, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.