Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

To thk Editor of thh "Evkniw* Mail." Fib— Briefly^ [told for the information of "An Inquiring Parent " in your Saturday* istue, the story of the Brigbtwater Committee in connection with the assistant " thai wa« to be" runs somewhat thus :— Tht names of three qualified candidatss wew submitted to the Committee to choos* from, but the aforesaid Committee decided, in iss wisdom, that it would appoint none of tbt , young ladies recommended by the Centra!' Board. The Committeemen had, it appears, a " protegca " of their own to whom thej hid previously arranged to give tbe.assistaatship. Ido not for a single moment wish it to be inferred that the " protcgeo" is not— wich the exception of the proper qualification, which, I believe, is wanting in her case — all that could b« desired. Indeed the m«re fact of standing so high in the Committee's estimation seerria to preclude the possibility of its being otherwise j a 1 till; it was to be expected that the Central Board might insist on seeing its recommendations, carried out, or refuse granting an assistant altogether, and people of common sense thought affairs would certainly take a turn in that direction. The Beven sageß took a different view, and the district is . now reaping the. benefit of their wisdom. That the Committee here haa a crotchet to which it firmly adheres, caring not whether it proves advantageous or not tothe locality, viz :■ never to appoint any person recommended by the Central Board, is a well known fact, and they as firmly believed, on this occasion— perhaps judging from "a priori"— that the Board would never venture to put its veto on their pet scheme. 'It seems, however, tbal the Board has, at last asserted its rights, in consequence of which the prospect of an assistant here Is greatly lessened, if not destroyed altogether. The Committee's behaviour in this— if in no other case — is much animadverted here, from which "an enquiiing pa,renjt" may, perhaps, derive some consolation in his present disappointment. i . . , ...:■■ I am, &c., ; * Common Sensb. ' Brigbtwater, Jane 13.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM18810614.2.9.1

Bibliographic details

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XVI, Issue 140, 14 June 1881, Page 2

Word Count
342

Untitled Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XVI, Issue 140, 14 June 1881, Page 2

Untitled Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XVI, Issue 140, 14 June 1881, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert