Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROHIBITION— IGNORING FACTS.

TO THE EDITOR. Sir, — The wholesale ignoring of the most important facts by the advocates of|the liquor traffic is very remarkable and significant. The all-bat unanimous verdict of the meat celebrated men — That alcohol in any quantity is not only unnecessary, but always more or less hurtful to the human being, according to the quantity taken ; and that it should be treated as, indeed what it is, a dangerous poison. That, unlike other poisons, it creates an insatiable appetite for itself. That, having got its fatal grip on the individnal, the family, or the community, it is the source of more misery, ruin, and crime, than any other evil civilised nations are subject to. That it causes the greatest waste of the rescources of every country encouraging it. That every attempt made to control it during hundreds of years, and by all nations, has absolutely failed — in fact, that regulation is simply impossible. That those advocating Prohibition only accept the inevitable. That the most intense selfishness mankind is capable of is alone responssible for carrying on the trade. That the colony to pay or throw away £1,500,000 for the right to collect £500,000 is the cream of folly. That these are not mere statements, but well attested facts. Now. sir, such being the case, does it not naturally devolve upon the said advocates of the traffic to find a reasonable remedy for this lamentable state of things ? The Prohibitionists bring forward what they consider the only care, and are abused in no measured terms for doing so. Has anyone a right_ to speak or write on this or any evil, without introducing some scheme likely to aoate or do away with it ? I was amused with Mr Murtagh— who we may take for granted is a native of the Emerald Isle— finding fault with agitatim. When his countryman, O'Connell, was asked the best way to bring about the redressing of Irish grievances, his wise reply was, Agitate 1 agitated agitate 111 No great reform has been secured without agitation. What is agitation but letting the searchlight shine on the subject ? Why does the liquor traffic hate the light ? Go on, Mr Murtagb I Your letters will do the good you don't intend. I am, etc., SearcbsLight. P.S.— The above are a few of the notable facts quietly ignored by the advocates of liquor license. — S.L.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18960925.2.36

Bibliographic details

Feilding Star, Volume XVIII, Issue 75, 25 September 1896, Page 2

Word Count
398

PROHIBITION—IGNORING FACTS. Feilding Star, Volume XVIII, Issue 75, 25 September 1896, Page 2

PROHIBITION—IGNORING FACTS. Feilding Star, Volume XVIII, Issue 75, 25 September 1896, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert